i don’t really want to get into a debate about how to compare the threat of suicide terrorism in a nuclear age to previously unknown viruses spreading pandemics. they’re both incredibly serious natsec issues which require risk management optimized for low-probability, highly catastrophic black swan outcomes. the point is that institution…
i don’t really want to get into a debate about how to compare the threat of suicide terrorism in a nuclear age to previously unknown viruses spreading pandemics. they’re both incredibly serious natsec issues which require risk management optimized for low-probability, highly catastrophic black swan outcomes. the point is that institution’s always opportunistically claim that they create special exceptions to civil liberties which are supposed to be inalienable and permanent in the West
i don’t really want to get into a debate about how to compare the threat of suicide terrorism in a nuclear age to previously unknown viruses spreading pandemics. they’re both incredibly serious natsec issues which require risk management optimized for low-probability, highly catastrophic black swan outcomes. the point is that institution’s always opportunistically claim that they create special exceptions to civil liberties which are supposed to be inalienable and permanent in the West
Agree to disagree on this one :)
thanks for issuing the correction at least :D